Global Minimum Tax and Transfer Pricing - Navigating the Next Wave of Change in 2026
Home • Events • Global Minimum Tax and Transfer Pricing - Navigating the Next Wave of Change in 2026
Home • Events • Global Minimum Tax and Transfer Pricing - Navigating the Next Wave of Change in 2026
Global Minimum Tax has moved beyond headlines and consultation papers. As more jurisdictions implement Pillar Two, tax leaders are facing real questions about how the rules interact with their existing transfer pricing, effective tax rates and global tax positions.
This webinar gives you the clarity and confidence you need to navigate the rapidly evolving Global Minimum Tax landscape. As jurisdictions roll out Pillar Two, the link between Global Minimum Tax and transfer pricing is becoming more direct, and the risks more immediate. You will gain practical insights, proactive strategies and clear next steps tailored to the realities tax and finance teams are facing right now.
Ready to navigate GMT with confidence? Our expert led webinar guides you through the ongoing changes.
Adriana Calderon, Managing Partner - Asia & Malaysia at Transfer Pricing Solutions, shares insights from the IFA APAC Conference in Tokyo, highlighting key trends in transfer pricing across Asia. She explores regional differences in approach, increasing regulatory complexity, and rising audit activity, while reflecting on the importance of global networks in fostering collaboration and shaping the future of international tax.
Malaysia’s transfer pricing framework continues to evolve, with the Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia applying increasing scrutiny to how multinational groups price, document and defend related‑party transactions. For businesses operating in Malaysia, transfer pricing has become a core tax risk area rather than a routine compliance exercise.
Across Asia, transfer pricing audits are becoming more frequent, more detailed and more analytically driven. Tax authorities are no longer limiting their reviews to whether documentation exists. Instead, they are interrogating whether transfer pricing outcomes genuinely align with commercial reality, operational substance and financial results over time.