The #TPS Way of Doing Business, how can companies benefit?

BlogThe #TPS Way of Doing Business, how can companies benefit?

Our firm has been a pioneer in using technology that allows our team of experts to work from anywhere and at any time. Our clients have also benefited immensely and have saved in their overall transfer pricing planning and compliance costs.

The traditional consulting model focuses on charging for advice based on the number of hours spent by the advisor. This model has numerous disadvantage to the clients.

  1. It encourages the advisor to spend more time on producing the advisory output
  2. It discourages the advisor to work smarter and efficient
  3. It gives no control to the client over its budget for the advisory
  4. It encourages the advisor to create unnecessary work

THE TPS DIFFERENCE: Our proposition is to work on fixed price per output, focusing on the result and outcome. Our Directors and group of experts can manage any transfer pricing project, big or small, across any industry in the most efficient way possible to make our clients' life easier. We understand your need and your expectations, and we make it happen.

WHY THE #TPSWAY? Have you heard the expression, “If you cannot explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough?"
As niche experts, we understand transfer pricing well enough to explain it to anyone in plain language, to provide solutions that are clear and practical.

This model has encouraged our firm to work smart and efficient using technology as our main ally. Our mantra is making the transfer pricing complexity as straight forward as possible for our customers.


  • Efficiency equals lower fees
  • Being straight forward and easy to deal equals clarity for our clients
  • Working smart equals lower fees
  • Focusing on output with fix price equals quick turn around
  • Outcome and results-driven equals quick turn around and a guaranteed solution to your transfer pricing needs

Feel free to reach out for a virtual coffee or catch up if you want to know more about our transfer pricing services or to hear more about doing business the TPS way.

Contributed by our Director Adriana Calderon

Adriana is the co-founder of Transfer Pricing Solutions Asia and Transfer Pricing Solutions Malaysia and Lead Partner in Asia.

Adriana has extensive international experience with Big Four and mid-tier firms advising multinational companies in the areas of corporate and international taxation across South America, the US, Australia and the Asia Pacific Region.

As a TP practitioner, Adriana has advised companies in the Asia Pacific Region across various industries and in a wide range of projects associated with planning.

Adriana also enjoys teaching and is a regular speaker and facilitator of Transfer Pricing seminars and workshops in Singapore. She is a transfer pricing trainer for the Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants and Singapore Institute of Accredited Tax Professionals.

Adriana lives in Singapore with her family and is a mother to two energetic boys.


Australia  | +61 (3) 59117001 |

Singapore  | +65 31585806  |

Malaysia  | +603 2298 7153  |

Related Blogs

20 Mar

Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Headquarters in Singapore

Singapore is often a preferred location for setting up headquarters as the door  to conduct business in Asia. The IRAS  has released its views on how Singapore HQ's should plan and implement their transfer pricing framework. Want to know more? Read our article with our views on IRAS TP Guidelines for Singapore HQs. 

10 Feb

Malaysia Transfer Pricing Update

The Malaysian Finance Bill 2020 incorporates transfer pricing-related changes to the current Income Tax Act, 1967 (“ITA”). The changes permit significantly greater authority to the Malaysia Inland Revenue Board (“MIRB”) and re-emphasises the importance of transfer pricing compliance, with effect from 1 January 2021.

10 Jan

Managing TP in Financial Transactions & Loans

The OECD guidance emphasised that, besides interest rates, all terms and conditions of the financing transactions (including the volume of debt) should be tested against the arm’s length principle.