Singapore IRAS warning on misuse of the services cost-plus 5% mark-up concession


It is common practice for businesses to price services transaction between related parties using cost plus a mark-up. In our experience, we have noticed a common trend to use a cost plus a 5% mark-up for any service transaction as an arm’s length price without considering the type of services being provided. 

A recurrent question that often arises is: Is it correct to use a cost plus 5% mark-up for any service transaction?

In a nutshell, no it’s not correct to use cost plus 5% mark-up for any service transaction.

The Inland Revenue of Singapore (IRAS) clarified in a recent statement Companies Servicing Only Related Parties when is it appropriate to use the cost plus 5% mark-up concession. The IRAS also explained in the transfer pricing guidelines fourth edition released in January 2017 what are the requirements that a taxpayer needs to meet to rely on the cost plus 5% mark-up concession.

What are the key requirements for a taxpayer to be eligible to use the cost plus 5% mark-up concession?

To alleviate compliance burden on companies, IRAS accept a cost plus 5% mark-up as an arm’s length price for certain routine support services if the following conditions are satisfied:

Routine support services are services that support the main business activity of a company different from the main activities by which the business derive its income, and therefore only a small mark-up is intended to be added. Examples of these services include support with accounting, auditing and legal matters, clerical and administration activities, computer support.  

  • The service provider does not offer the same routine support services to an unrelated party; and
  • All cost including direct, indirect and operating costs relating to the routine support services performed are taken into account in computing the 5% mark-up.

What is the benefit for taxpayers when using the cost plus 5% mark-up concession?

The main benefit for a taxpayer if using the cost plus 5% mark-up concession is that it does not have to prepare a comprehensive transfer pricing analysis including a benchmarking analysis to support the 5% mark-up.

However, simplified documentation is still required to substantiate the following:

  • A description of the activities being performed and why they are routine in nature
  • A description of the benefits received by the recipient (also known as ‘benefit test’)
  • A description of the costs included in the cost base
  • If used, an analysis of the allocation keys used to allocate costs among the related parties. 

Do I always have to use a cost plus 5% mark-up for routine services as an arm’s length price?

No. A taxpayer can adopt a mark-up that is different from the 5% mark up as an arm’s length price for a transaction involving routine service. For a different mark-up to be acceptable, the taxpayer will have to demonstrate that the mark-up is at arm's length. For this purpose, the taxpayer will be required to:

  • Support their basis with detailed transfer pricing analysis;
  • Apply the mark-up consistently year-after-year throughout the group until there are material changes to the circumstances or services provided; and
  • Review the mark-up regularly to ensure that it continues to reflect the arm's length conditions.


Contact Transfer Pricing Solutions


+61 (3) 59117001


+65 31585806

Other Recent Posts

On 01 November 2018, the Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (“IRBM”) had a dialogue session with the Chartered Tax Institute of Malaysia (“CTIM”)’s Technical Committee on the updated version (mainly from Chapters II to XI) of the Malaysian Transfer Pricing Guidelines (“TP Guidelines”)

With the recent focus on profit shifting around the world, guidance on profit split method has revised by Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (“OECD”) in June 2018. OECD published the “Revised Guidance on the Application of the Transactional Profit Split Method” under Base Erosion Profit Shifting (“BEPS”) project - Action 10.